The term "working people " has split Paste BN readers, after deputy political editor Sam Coates reported the Treasury defined them as people earning £45,000 or less.
After we published this survey earlier...
...some wrote in to tell us the government was out of touch for setting the level so low, while others said £45,000 was far too high in their area of the country.
Before we share some of your reactions, though, reader Aaron wanted some clarification...
"Important context is required for your poll of what defines a "working person" - how many people are in each band? What percentage of Brits earn less than £45,000, what percentage earn between £45,000 and £125,000?"
Aaron
How many people earn what in the UK
There's some competing data on this, but we can paint a rough picture, starting with government data on income tax payers in 2024-25:
- 78.8% earned between £12,571 to £50,270
- 16.9% earned between £50,271 and £125,140
- 3% earned more than £125,140
Now, the second bracket (£50,271 and £125,140) is extremely wide and covers very different qualities of life.
An HSBC survey helps us narrow that down, finding only 3.8% of earners take a salary of more than £100,000.
There's also theoretically no limit to how large the £125,140+ bracket could be.
A 2019 study from the Institute of Fiscal Studies, while relying on older data, gives us a ballpark understanding of how earnings are distributed at the top.
The top 1% of income tax payers earn £160,000; the top 0.5% earn £236,000; and the top 0.1% earn £650,000.
'£45,000 is a joke'
Reader Andrew in Oxford, who is in the top 16.9% of earners, took issue with how the Treasury arrived at its £45,000 figure.
"My salary is £82,000 for a 35-hour week which is a decent salary if the government is to be believed. However, in reality I work 55 hours a week and if you adjust the figures to reflect the true hourly rate I am on the equivalent of £50,000 - am I a working person?"
As did others...
"The working people definition is absurd. Higher rate taxpayers foot the bill for the economy because they work far more hours than the 9-5 assumption that Labour and the cohort of followers seem to believe. Any industry, any position, higher salary=longer hours."
Phil
"The level stated by the Treasury is a joke. I earn £62k a year, I pay lots in taxes that are taken from what I EARN. I work long days/night shifts to earn that, yet I'm not a working person? My wife earns £21k, so between us we are not well off."
Jamie B
"I work as a paramedic in Scotland for over 30 years. We earn over £47k, so we are front line staff, how am I not 'working people'?"
HMAC
'You're rich if you earn £45,000'
Other readers took the opposite view...
"£45,000 is too high. People who earn this are rich."
Silkin
"Here in the North East you will find that the vast majority of people only earn minimum wage, no matter how skilled their job is. They earn nowhere near £45,000. Minimum wage is a way for employers to get cheap labour and pocket the profits."
Kathleen Scott
"Try living on a good wage in Hull which is £30,000"
Gaz
"I don't earn anywhere near £45,000."
Mikesmith
Some pointed out the Treasury definition omits geography...
"In certain areas of the country (particularly London and the Home Counties) an income of £45,000 is subsistence level, whilst in many areas of the North East and Scotland it would be considered a fortune. Shouldn't the government allow for these regional variations?"
Panopticon
Let's just drop the phrase altogether, said one reader...
"'Working people' are surely those that are working with what ever salary they earn. Let's go back to the word 'working class' if differentiation's have to be made!"
Mandilifeboats