The politics behind EU's Ukraine meeting
Thursday's EU summit on Ukraine has been and gone without a deal to use frozen Russian assets to fund Kyiv's war effort.
European leaders are hoping a €90bn interest-free loan, without doubt a huge amount of money, is a good enough compromise.
The bloc's members had been reluctant to ignore the concerns of Belgium, where most of the assets are based, and whose government feared Russian reprisal, by forcing through a deal against its wishes.
Sky's Europe correspondent Alistair Bunkall explains the country's position below:
But why was there such a push to use the frozen assets all of a sudden, after almost four years of war?
Bunkall wrote this explanation ahead of Thursday's talks:
The US, which has so far given billions of dollars to Kyiv, is losing interest under Trump and can no longer be relied upon for financial support.
Previously, the EU had been giving the interest generated from frozen Russian assets to Ukraine, but was worried it might destabilise the Eurozone economy if it touched the assets itself.
That changed as Ukraine's need has become more acute and fears over Russia's wider imperialist ambitions have grown in recent months.
An unlocking of seized Russian assets was also being seen as a way to buy Brussels more leverage in peace negotiations, as well as reducing Kyiv's dependency on Washington.