Rayner returns to defend Workers Rights Bill
Angela Rayner made a dramatic return to frontline political debate with a powerful defence of the workers’ rights legislation she championed as deputy prime minister.
In the latest Commons clash during parliamentary "ping pong" with the House of Lords over her Employment Rights Bill, she said it was good for workers and for business.
In only her second speech from the back benches – the first was her resignation statement last month – she accused the Conservatives of wanting to sack workers unfairly.
"This bill was a promise we made to the British public," she declared. "It is our duty to deliver it. And I say to my colleagues on the frontbench that I will be with you every step of the way as we do just that.
"Make no mistakes. The Bill is good for workers and it is good for business. This isn't just the right thing to do, it's the foundation for the high-growth, high-skill economy that the UK needs."
Attacking the Tories for their opposition to the bill, Ms Rayner said: "I cannot believe the party opposite thinks in this day and age we should dismiss people unfairly. I don't understand it.
"On this side of the House, we believe workers deserve fairness, dignity and respect at work, and they deserve it from day one on the job."
Earlier, writing in The Guardian, she said: "This game changing package of measures includes protection from unfair dismissal, strengthened sick pay, bereavement leave, action against sexual harassment at work, a ban on zero-hours contracts, an end to fire and rehire, and a genuine living wage.
"It means family rights such as flexible working and parental leave from day one, stronger protections for pregnant women, and steps to tackle the gender pay gap.
"Taken together, this package would be the single biggest boost to rights at work in a generation."
The Commons debate also saw a fierce clash between shadow business secretary Andrew Griffith and left-wing Labour MP Ian Lavery, who accused him of despising trade unions and working people
The clash came as Mr Griffith hit out at the large number of Labour MPs who receive donations from trade unions and claimed: "Follow the money."
Mr Lavery, the former National Union of Mineworkers president, protested: "The shadow minister has shown how much he absolutely despises the trade union movement and ordinary working people."
Mr Griffith asked him to withdraw, saying it was "not worthy of him", and insisted: "I don't despite trade unions, not a single word I have ever said at the despatch box indicates anything of the sort."
Attacking the bill, Mr Griffith said it was a "clunking fist of regulation dictating and providing perverse incentives, maybe unintended consequences, that mean employers simply won't take a chance on those young people at all".
He claimed it would hurt British businesses and make it harder for vulnerable workers such as young people, disabled people, those over 50, and former prisoners to get a job.
Prolonging "ping pong" again, a Lords amendment, passed last week, to remove day-one protection from unfair dismissal from the bill was rejected by 308 votes to 153, a majority of 155.
Other Lords amendments, on changing the bill's provisions over guaranteed hours for workers and keeping the 50% turnout threshold for industrial action ballots, were also rejected.
Newly appointed employment rights minister Kate Rearden, a former trade union official, told MPs the government was committed to delivering unfair dismissal protection from day one.
"Day one protection from unfair dismissal will not remove the right of businesses to dismiss people who cannot do their job or pass a probation," she said.
"But it will tackle cases of unfair dismissal, where hard-working employees are sacked without a good reason."
She said a six-month qualifying period threshold, proposed by the Lords, left employees exposed to dismissal without good reason in the early months of a new job.
On guaranteed hours, Ms Dearden said the Lords changes would undermine the bill's core aim of ending exploitative contracts and providing security for workers who needed it most.